Reviewed by Thomas Sowell
“…let us not love in word or in tongue, but in deed and in truth.”*I John 3:18*
[Then one of His disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, who would betray Him, said,] “Why was this fragrant oil not sold for three-hundred denarii and given to the poor?” This he said not because he cared for the poor, but because he was a thief and had the money box; and he used to take what was put in it. John 12:4-6
More frightening than any particular beliefs or policies is an utter lack of any sense of a need to test those beliefs and policies against hard evidence. Mistakes can be corrected by those who pay attention to facts but dogmatism will not be corrected by those who are wedded to a vision.
One of the most pervasive political visions of our time is the vision of liberals as compassionate and conservatives as less caring. It is liberals who advocate “forgiveness” of loans to third-world countries, a “living wage” for the poor and a “safety net” for all.
But these are all government policies — not individual acts of compassion — and the actual empirical consequences of such policies are of remarkably little interest to those who advocate them. Depending on what those consequences are, there may be good reasons to oppose them, so being for or against these policies may tell us nothing about who is compassionate or caring and who is not.
A new book, titled Who Really Cares by Arthur C. Brooks examines the actual behavior of liberals and conservatives when it comes to donating their own time, money, or blood for the benefit of others. It is remarkable that beliefs on this subject should have become conventional, if not set in concrete, for decades before anyone bothered to check these beliefs against facts.
What are those facts?
People who identify themselves as conservatives donate money to charity more often than people who identify themselves as liberals. They donate more money and a higher percentage of their incomes.
It is not that conservatives have more money. Liberal families average 6 percent higher incomes than conservative families.
You may recall a flap during the 2000 election campaign when the fact came out that Al Gore donated a smaller percentage of his income to charity than the national average. That was perfectly consistent with his liberalism.
So is the fact that most of the states that voted for John Kerry during the 2004 election donated a lower percentage of their incomes to charity than the states that voted for George W. Bush.
Conservatives not only donate more money to charity than liberals do, conservatives volunteer more time as well. More conservatives than liberals also donate blood.
According to Professor Brooks: “If liberals and moderates gave blood at the same rate as conservatives, the blood supply of the United States would jump about 45 percent.”
Professor Brooks admits that the facts he uncovered were the opposite of what he expected to find — so much so that he went back and checked these facts again, to make sure there was no mistake.
What is the reason why some people are liberals and others are conservatives, if it is not that liberals are more compassionate?
Fundamental differences in ideology go back to fundamental assumptions about human nature. Based on one set of assumptions, it makes perfect sense to be a liberal. Based on a different set of assumptions, it makes perfect sense to be a conservative.
The two visions are not completely symmetrical, however. For at least two centuries, the vision of the left has included a belief that those with that vision are morally superior, more caring and more compassionate.
While both sides argue that their opponents are mistaken, those on the left have declared their opponents to be not merely in error but morally flawed as well. So the idea that liberals are more caring and compassionate goes with the territory, whether or not it fits the facts.
Those on the left proclaimed their moral superiority in the 18th century and they continue to proclaim it in the 21st century. What is remarkable is how long it took for anyone to put that belief to the test — and how completely it failed that test.
The two visions are different in another way. The vision of the left exalts the young especially as idealists while the more conservative vision warns against the narrowness and shallowness of the inexperienced. This study found young liberals to make the least charitable contributions of all, whether in money, time or blood. Idealism in words is not idealism in deeds.
– Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
Article from nationalreviewonline.com
- What Happened? Hillary Rodham Clinton
- America vs. The Welfare State
- The Advancing Kingdom of God
- Reviving Gospel Hope for the 21st Century
- Tribulation, Justice, and Victory
- Communion: Killing Hostility
- Liberals, Conservatives, and Charity
- Are We Facing the ‘End-Times’ — Again?
- The Idea of America and Why it Matters
- What if Trump and Clinton Traded Places?
- The Pastors of Early America
- What Would a Biblical Society Look Like Today?
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
Who and WhatAmerica authority Bojidar Marinov capitalism Christian Christianity church communion communism community Constitution culture doctrine Dominion economics education end times equality ethics evangelical evil faith Fascism freedom future Gary DeMar gospel government grace history Holy Spirit humanism Israel Jesus Jesus Christ judgment justice knowledge last-days law Liberal liberalism liberty life love mercy morality peace Pete Coker philosophy Politico-Magical World politics power President Obama prophecy Religion Rev. R.J. Rushdoony revelation revolution righteousness salvation science socialism social justice spirit State of Grace the church Theology Theology of Fascism Theology of the State Tri-Universe truth unity worldview worship
Top Posts & Pages
- Vocation, Work and Eschatology
- Marxism -- Cultural Marxism -- and Protestant Theology
- The Gnostic Tradition and Renaissance Occultism
- Theology of Poverty
- Trichotomy, Dichotomy, and Psychosomatic Unity
- Presuppositional Evolution: A Scientific Paradigm?
- Post-Thanksgiving Thanks to Gospel Progressives
- The New Sovereignty: A Return to Roman Antiquity?
- Charles Spurgeon Preaching on Socialism
Jesus said …what?
"Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. For I have come to alienate a man from his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law." (Matt. 10:34-35; also see Micah 7: 5-6)
Not everyone who says to Me, "Lord, Lord," shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, 'Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in your name, and done many wonders in Your name?' "And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice LAWLESSNESS!' (Matt. 7: 21-23)
"Well did Isaiah prophecy of you hypocrites, as it is written:
'This people honors Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me.
And in vain they worship Me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.' For LAYING ASIDE THE COMMANDMENT OF GOD, you hold the tradition of men. (Mark 7: 6-8)
Then His Disciples asked Him, saying, "What does this parable mean?" And He (Jesus) said, "To you it has been given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God, but to the rest it is given in parables, that, seeing they may not see, and hearing they may not understand."
Likewise the soldiers asked him (Jesus), saying, "And what shall we do?" So he said to them, "Do not intimidate anyone or accuse falsely, and be content with your wages."
"Do not give dogs what is holy, and do not throw your pearls before pigs, lest they trample them under foot and turn to attack you." (Jesus) Matt. 7: 6
But as for these enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and slaughter them before me. (Jesus; Parable of the Minas, Luke 19:27)